BLOG · EAA & PRICING

What Does an Accessibility Audit Cost in 2026?
Real Numbers for Small Agencies

Quotes range from $0 to $30,000 — and both can be legitimate. Here is what each price tier actually buys, what drives the cost, how to scope your own audits, and what to charge clients under the EAA.

Updated August 2026 · Reading time: 8 minutes

why-prices-vary

Ask three vendors what an accessibility audit costs and you will get three answers that differ by a factor of ten. That is not price gouging — "audit" covers everything from a two-minute automated crawler report to a multi-week manual evaluation with assistive technology users. The deliverables, rigour, and legal weight are completely different.

The realistic 2026 market ranges: automated scans run from free to about $500; hybrid audits (automated plus targeted manual testing) land around $1,500-$3,500 for a small site; full manual audits from specialist firms cost roughly $5,000-$15,000 for small-to-mid sites and $30,000+ for complex applications; enterprise platforms with continuous monitoring run $20,000-$150,000 per year.

🆓 Automated scan: $0-$500

Tools like axe DevTools, Lighthouse, WAVE, and our own free scanner catch roughly 30-40% of WCAG issues — contrast, alt text, form labels, heading structure. A baseline, never a defensible audit on its own.

🔍 Hybrid audit: ~$1,500-$3,500

An automated scan plus 6-12 hours of experienced manual testing (keyboard navigation, screen reader pass on key flows). The best value tier for a typical small business site.

🎓 Full manual audit: $5,000-$15,000+

Specialist firm tests every unique template and interactive component against WCAG 2.2 AA, with severity-rated findings and fix recommendations. Required when legal defensibility matters.

cost-drivers

The biggest cost driver is not page count — auditors test by representative sample. It is the number of unique page templates and interactive components. A 45-page B2B site built on one template audits for a fraction of a 20-page site with a custom checkout, booking flow, and member area.

Other drivers: whether you need WCAG 2.1 AA or 2.2 AA; whether user testing with assistive technology users is included; whether formal documentation is required (a VPAT report alone adds $10,000+); and remediation, which vendors quote separately — budget roughly one to three times the audit fee to actually fix what was found.

For calibration, recently reported real engagements: an 8-page lawyer website hybrid audit came in around $1,800; a 45-page SaaS marketing site full manual audit around $8,500; a 200-page e-commerce store with user testing around $18,000.

eaa-angle

If you build for EU clients, the European Accessibility Act changes the calculus. Since June 2025, covered services must conform with EN 301 549 (which incorporates WCAG 2.1 AA) and publish an accessibility statement. Market surveillance authorities enforce this — and unlike the US demand-letter market, enforcement comes from the state with fines that reach into the millions in some member states.

Practically, that means every covered client project now has an implicit line item: prove conformance or fix the gaps. A free automated scan plus a scoped hybrid review of the critical flows (checkout, signup, contact) is usually enough to identify what needs fixing on a small site. A full $15,000 manual audit is rarely necessary for a five-page brochure site — but "we ran a widget" is worth nothing.

This is also where the commercial opportunity sits for agencies. Most clients cannot evaluate accessibility themselves. If you can deliver "scan + fixes + accessibility statement" as a packaged service line, you are selling certainty at a price far below what specialist firms charge for the same small sites.

pricing-your-work

If you are the agency doing the work, here is a sane way to package it:

• Free scan of every client site as the conversation starter — it takes minutes and produces a concrete findings list. • Fixed-price "Accessibility Baseline" package: scan + template-level fixes for all automatically-detectable failures + keyboard check of critical flows + accessibility statement. For most small sites this is 1-3 days of work. • Hourly or fixed-price deeper remediation for anything the scan cannot see, scoped after the baseline. • Optional quarterly re-scan subscription so regressions get caught — recurring revenue that costs you almost nothing to deliver with automation.

Price the baseline at what your market carries — commonly €900-€2,500 for a small business site in Western Europe. That undercuts specialist firm quotes substantially while being genuinely more useful to the client than a PDF they cannot act on.

💰 Sell outcomes, not reports

Clients do not want an audit document — they want a site that passes and a statement they can publish. Package scan + fix + statement as one deliverable.

🔁 Make re-scanning recurring

A light monthly or quarterly re-scan keeps sites compliant after content changes and gives you predictable revenue for near-zero effort.

📈 Use the scan as the wedge

A free scan with real findings opens a conversation no cold pitch can. It demonstrates the problem exists on their site, today.

Going Deeper

Before anyone spends money on an audit, run the free checks first. Our EAA checklist walks through 10 practical steps that catch most issues on a small site — start there.

Run the Free WCAG Scanner → →    Read the EAA Checklist → →

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does a website accessibility audit cost in 2026?

It depends on depth. Automated scans are free to ~$500. A hybrid audit (automated plus targeted manual testing) typically runs $1,500-$3,500 for a small business site. Full manual audits from specialist firms cost roughly $5,000-$15,000 for small-to-mid sites and $30,000+ for complex applications. Enterprise monitoring platforms run $20,000-$150,000 per year.

Why do audit quotes vary so much?

Because "audit" spans very different products: crawler reports, hybrid reviews, and full manual evaluations against WCAG 2.2 AA with screen reader testing. Cost scales mainly with the number of unique templates and interactive components tested, and whether assistive-technology user testing or formal documentation (like a VPAT) is included.

Is a free automated scan enough?

No — automated tools only detect roughly 30-40% of WCAG issues. They verify that alt text and labels exist, not that they are meaningful, and cannot test keyboard traps or screen reader behaviour. But as a first step they are unbeatable: free, fast, and they surface the majority of defects on a typical small site.

Does remediation cost extra?

Yes. Audit fees cover finding problems, not fixing them. Budget roughly one to three times the audit fee for remediation, depending on how many issues exist and how the site is built. Template-level fixes reduce this dramatically — one component repair can resolve findings across hundreds of pages.

What does my EU client legally need under the EAA?

Covered services must conform with EN 301 549 (WCAG 2.1 AA) and publish an accessibility statement. There is no mandated audit format — but you need documented evidence of conformance. For a small site, a free scan plus a scoped manual review of critical flows and a statement based on the results is a proportionate, defensible approach.

How much should I charge a client for accessibility work?

Package it rather than billing vaguely: a fixed-price baseline (scan + fixes + keyboard check + accessibility statement) at €900-€2,500 for a typical small business site, then scope deeper remediation separately. Add an optional low-cost re-scan subscription for ongoing compliance. You stay well under specialist-firm pricing while delivering something actionable.

Run the Free WCAG Scanner → →    Read the EAA Checklist → →